Skip to content

Conversation

@ThomasJannaud
Copy link
Contributor

Summary: Constant folding should fold 'None' and consider it a constant

Differential Revision: D74280168

@pytorch-bot
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented May 7, 2025

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/executorch/10755

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

❗ 1 Active SEVs

There are 1 currently active SEVs. If your PR is affected, please view them below:

❌ 2 New Failures

As of commit 92cd06d with merge base ee6cf99 (image):

NEW FAILURES - The following jobs have failed:

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot added the CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. label May 7, 2025
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D74280168

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented May 7, 2025

This PR needs a release notes: label

If your changes are user facing and intended to be a part of release notes, please use a label starting with release notes:.

If not, please add the topic: not user facing label.

To add a label, you can comment to pytorchbot, for example
@pytorchbot label "topic: not user facing"

For more information, see
https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/wiki/PyTorch-AutoLabel-Bot#why-categorize-for-release-notes-and-how-does-it-work.

ThomasJannaud added a commit to ThomasJannaud/executorch that referenced this pull request May 7, 2025
Summary:

Constant folding should fold 'None' and consider it a constant

Reviewed By: dulinriley

Differential Revision: D74280168
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: pytorch#10755

Constant folding should fold 'None' and consider it a constant

Reviewed By: dulinriley

Differential Revision: D74280168
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D74280168

@JacobSzwejbka
Copy link
Contributor

Sorry for the late review. Can you add some context on this? Does const_prop not trigger if one of the args is None? Can you add a unit test that wouldve failed before this change?

@github-actions
Copy link

Looks like this PR hasn't been updated in a while so we're going to go ahead and mark this as Stale.
Feel free to remove the Stale label if you feel this was a mistake.
If you are unable to remove the Stale label please contact a maintainer in order to do so.
If you want the bot to never mark this PR stale again, add the no-stale label.
Stale pull requests will automatically be closed after 30 days of inactivity.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale PRs inactive for over 60 days label Oct 12, 2025
@ThomasJannaud
Copy link
Contributor Author

closed in favor of #10762

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. fb-exported stale PRs inactive for over 60 days

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants